Featured Post

Tuesday, October 13, 2026

Coincidence...or Something More Sinister? Plus, A Suspense Sisters Giveaway!

 Hello, suspense lovers! Mary Alford here.

I have a question for you today.

Do you believe in coincidences?



I'm not talking about the little everyday coincidences, like running into an old friend at the grocery store or thinking about someone moments before they call.

I'm talking about the kind that makes the hair on the back of your neck stand up.

Imagine this…

Twelve years ago, a man was murdered along a lonely mountain road in a quiet Amish community. His killer was never found.

Now, more than a decade later, his son is discovered dead in almost the exact same location.

Authorities believe the young man took his own life.

But his sister knows better.

Two deaths. One lonely stretch of road. Twelve years of secrets.

Coincidence?

Or has someone been hiding a terrible truth all these years?

That's the mystery at the heart of my upcoming Love Inspired Suspense release, Secrets in Amish Country, coming October 27!

When Eve Lantz returns to Rachel's Crossing, Kentucky, following her brother's shocking death, she's forced to confront the painful memories that drove her away years earlier.

Eve has spent twelve years blaming herself for her father's murder. Now she's facing another devastating loss, and she's determined not to let her brother's death become another unsolved tragedy.

Fortunately, her childhood friend, Assistant Police Chief Casey Masterson, is there to help her search for answers.

But someone is watching.

Someone who knows what happened all those years ago.

And someone who will do whatever it takes to make sure Eve never uncovers the truth.

What happens when the past won’t stay buried?

One of the things I love most about writing suspense is exploring how the past can reach into the present.

Sometimes the most dangerous secrets aren't hidden in dark alleys or abandoned buildings. They're buried in the very places we consider safe.

And sometimes the people we trust most are the ones who have the most to hide.

But while I love creating mysteries that keep readers guessing, there's something even more important to me when I write Christian suspense.

I want my characters to discover that even in their darkest moments, God hasn't abandoned them.



In Secrets in Amish Country, Eve has carried the weight of guilt for twelve years. She believes her choices led to her father's death, and that burden has affected not only her life but also her relationship with God.

Now, as she searches for answers about her brother's death, Eve must confront something even harder than a killer.

She must learn to forgive herself and trust the God she's kept at a distance for so long.

One of the Scriptures that speaks to the heart of this story is Psalm 91:2 (KJV):

"I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in him will I trust."

I love that reminder.

Life doesn't always turn out the way we expect. Sometimes we face heartbreak, unanswered questions, or circumstances that leave us wondering where God is in the middle of it all.

But even when we can't see what lies ahead, we can trust the One who does.

That's the kind of hope I want readers to carry away when they finish one of my books.

And it's a message that's especially close to my heart in Secrets in Amish Country.

Of course, before Eve can find peace with her past, she'll have to survive someone determined to make sure the truth stays buried.

And that brings me to today's giveaway!

I'm giving away one print copy of Secrets in Amish Country to a reader who comments on today's post!

Here's your detective challenge:

Two members of the same family die in nearly the same location, twelve years apart. The second death is ruled a possible suicide.

If you were the detective assigned to this case, what would be your FIRST move?

A. Reopen the father's murder investigation. There has to be a connection.

B. Investigate the son's final days. What did he know that might have gotten him killed?

C. Return to the crime scene. Maybe there's something investigators overlooked.

D. Start questioning family friends and neighbors. Someone knows more than they're saying.

Tell me your answer in the comments!

I'll randomly select one commenter to receive a print copy of Secrets in Amish Country. Be sure to leave your email address in your comment.

Mary Alford

65 comments:

  1. C - always go back to the scene of the crime then follow-up with the rest of these choices. I love visiting Rachel's Crossing! ceedee1958@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good advice, Cyndi. And I'm so glad you're enjoying Rachel's Crossing. It was so much fun to write about.

      Delete
  2. Heather Swanson heatherlynnswanson@hotmail.comOctober 14, 2026 at 11:38 AM

    I would chose D somebody knows something

    ReplyDelete
  3. D
    bn100candg at hotmail dot com

    ReplyDelete
  4. First & foremost C. Before they clear the crime scene of all evidence!

    ReplyDelete
  5. C. Need to see what I can find myself. cherierj(at)yahoo(dot)com

    ReplyDelete
  6. C. Return to the crime scene. dianah7272@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  7. A. Then, maybe talk to neighbors, and return to scene of crime. Lual Krautter Email: krautter62520AToutlookDOTcom

    ReplyDelete
  8. B Look into the son's death and go from there. wauna01 at gmail dot com

    ReplyDelete
  9. Such a great Book I highly recommend it!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I don't believe in coincidences, I DO believe something fishy is going on!! Love your books, Mary!
    dianalflowers at aol dot com

    ReplyDelete
  11. While all of those options must be followed, the detective must first examine the crime scene.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I'd start with returning to the crime scene and then do all the above.

    SECRETS IS AMISH COUNTRY is a magnificent FIVE STAR book. I was blessed with the opportunity of reading an ARC so I'm not entering the contest so someone else can enjoy the thrill of reading it.
    2clowns at arkansas dot net

    ReplyDelete
  13. C. Return to the crime scene. Maybe there's something investigators overlooked. michelena2000@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  14. C return to the crime scene and I don't believe in coincidences jenningsask@verizon.net

    ReplyDelete
  15. I would start with C, then B, followed by A, and end with D. An9ther set if eyes on a crime scene never hurts in case something was overlooked or thought unrelated.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I would start with C and then move on to A, B, and D. Sometimes the smallest details are the most important clues yet easiest to overlook.

    svenable(at)westmont(dot)edu

    ReplyDelete
  17. C followed by B & A, all close to the same time frame. While I’m at the scene, I would have somebody pull up the records of dad‘s death and then heading to talk to the family and friends.
    Jeeplvrdee@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  18. C for sure! Always go back to the scene of the crime to get a feel for where it happened even if the forensics team didn't miss anything.
    Christy41970 (at) Gmail (dot) com

    ReplyDelete
  19. C, while the evidence is still there, then D. Marthaelaufer@outlook.com

    ReplyDelete
  20. C first. Then B, A and D. cji789(at)outlook(dot)com

    ReplyDelete
  21. A they missed something the first time. nanaalexander@hotmail.com

    ReplyDelete
  22. Not entering. This is a fabulous book. It is a must read for everyone who loves mystery and suspense.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I would have to say to do "all of the above" to find out everything!

    ReplyDelete
  24. C and then And B with D last.

    ReplyDelete
  25. D. Start questioning family friends and neighbors. Someone knows more than they're saying.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I would say C. I love your books. lindadashhendersonatattdotnet

    ReplyDelete
  27. I think C and D. Some has to know something, even if they don't think they don't. Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Thanks for the giveaway! I would say C. You have to start where the crime occurred and work backwards to figure out who is responsible for it. deborahdumm(AT)yahoo(DOT)com

    ReplyDelete
  29. I would start at the scene of the crime. All the other things can be done later, but physical evidence gets lost pretty quickly.

    ReplyDelete
  30. This an interestinginvestigation

    ReplyDelete
  31. This is an interesting investigation!! Yes, I believe coincidence in most cases! Ok, I think I would choose B first - investigate the son's final days and then A reopen the father's murder. Apparently, they are related! cwkuen(at)yahoo(dot)com

    ReplyDelete
  32. Sometimes a coincidence seems a little too strange to be just chance! I love a mystery that keeps me guessing.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I would start with the crime scene. It'll tell how the crime was committed & may yield clues that the first investigators may have overlooked. A fresh pair of eyes thing.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Investigate the son's final days

    ReplyDelete
  35. I’d choose C. Return to the crime scene. You never know what detail was overlooked the first time around, and the fact that two family members died in nearly the same location twelve years apart seems like more than a coincidence. Sometimes the smallest clue unlocks the biggest mystery! kykla99ATgmailDOTcom

    ReplyDelete