Hello, suspense lovers! Mary Alford here.
I have a question for you today.
Do you believe in coincidences?
I'm not talking about the little everyday coincidences, like running into
an old friend at the grocery store or thinking about someone moments before
they call.
I'm talking about the kind that makes the hair on the back of your neck
stand up.
Imagine this…
Twelve years ago, a man was murdered along a lonely mountain road in a
quiet Amish community. His killer was never found.
Now, more than a decade later, his son is discovered dead in almost the
exact same location.
Authorities believe the young man took his own life.
But his sister knows better.
Two deaths. One lonely stretch of road. Twelve years of secrets.
Coincidence?
Or has someone been hiding a terrible truth all these years?
That's the mystery at the heart of my upcoming Love Inspired Suspense
release, Secrets in Amish Country, coming October 27!
When Eve Lantz returns to Rachel's Crossing, Kentucky, following her
brother's shocking death, she's forced to confront the painful memories that
drove her away years earlier.
Eve has spent twelve years blaming herself for her father's murder. Now
she's facing another devastating loss, and she's determined not to let her
brother's death become another unsolved tragedy.
Fortunately, her childhood friend, Assistant Police Chief Casey
Masterson, is there to help her search for answers.
But someone is watching.
Someone who knows what happened all those years ago.
And someone who will do whatever it takes to make sure Eve never uncovers
the truth.
What happens when the past won’t stay buried?
One of the things I love most about writing suspense is exploring how the
past can reach into the present.
Sometimes the most dangerous secrets aren't hidden in dark alleys or
abandoned buildings. They're buried in the very places we consider safe.
And sometimes the people we trust most are the ones who have the most to
hide.
But while I love creating mysteries that keep readers guessing, there's
something even more important to me when I write Christian suspense.
I want my characters to discover that even in their darkest moments, God
hasn't abandoned them.
In Secrets in Amish Country, Eve has carried the weight of guilt
for twelve years. She believes her choices led to her father's death, and that
burden has affected not only her life but also her relationship with God.
Now, as she searches for answers about her brother's death, Eve must
confront something even harder than a killer.
She must learn to forgive herself and trust the God she's kept at a
distance for so long.
One of the Scriptures that speaks to the heart of this story is Psalm
91:2 (KJV):
"I will say of the LORD, He is my refuge and my fortress: my God; in
him will I trust."
I love that reminder.
Life doesn't always turn out the way we expect. Sometimes we face
heartbreak, unanswered questions, or circumstances that leave us wondering
where God is in the middle of it all.
But even when we can't see what lies ahead, we can trust the One who
does.
That's the kind of hope I want readers to carry away when they finish one
of my books.
And it's a message that's especially close to my heart in Secrets in
Amish Country.
Of course, before Eve can find peace with her past, she'll have to
survive someone determined to make sure the truth stays buried.
And that brings me to today's giveaway!
I'm giving away one print copy of Secrets in Amish Country to a
reader who comments on today's post!
Here's your detective challenge:
Two members of the same family die in nearly the same location, twelve
years apart. The second death is ruled a possible suicide.
If you were the detective assigned to this case, what would be your FIRST
move?
A. Reopen the father's
murder investigation. There has to be a connection.
B. Investigate the
son's final days. What did he know that might have gotten him killed?
C. Return to the crime
scene. Maybe there's something investigators overlooked.
D. Start questioning
family friends and neighbors. Someone knows more than they're saying.
Tell me your answer in the comments!
I'll randomly select one commenter to receive a print copy of Secrets
in Amish Country. Be sure to leave your email address in your comment.
Mary Alford


C - always go back to the scene of the crime then follow-up with the rest of these choices. I love visiting Rachel's Crossing! ceedee1958@gmail.com
ReplyDeleteGood advice, Cyndi. And I'm so glad you're enjoying Rachel's Crossing. It was so much fun to write about.
DeleteI don't believe in coincidences.
ReplyDeleteEscpecially when they add up...
DeleteI would chose D somebody knows something
ReplyDeleteagreed!
DeleteD
ReplyDeletebn100candg at hotmail dot com
First & foremost C. Before they clear the crime scene of all evidence!
ReplyDeleteI can see that, Dreaa!
DeleteC. Need to see what I can find myself. cherierj(at)yahoo(dot)com
ReplyDeleteI like it!
DeleteC. Return to the crime scene. dianah7272@gmail.com
ReplyDeleteYes!
DeleteA. Then, maybe talk to neighbors, and return to scene of crime. Lual Krautter Email: krautter62520AToutlookDOTcom
ReplyDeleteSomeone had to have seen something.
DeleteB Look into the son's death and go from there. wauna01 at gmail dot com
ReplyDeleteMakes sense.
DeleteSuch a great Book I highly recommend it!
ReplyDeleteThank you, Sarah!
DeleteI don't believe in coincidences, I DO believe something fishy is going on!! Love your books, Mary!
ReplyDeletedianalflowers at aol dot com
Thank you, Diana!
DeleteWhile all of those options must be followed, the detective must first examine the crime scene.
ReplyDeleteGood thinking, Lisa.
DeleteI'd start with returning to the crime scene and then do all the above.
ReplyDeleteSECRETS IS AMISH COUNTRY is a magnificent FIVE STAR book. I was blessed with the opportunity of reading an ARC so I'm not entering the contest so someone else can enjoy the thrill of reading it.
2clowns at arkansas dot net
Thank you, Kay!
DeleteC. Return to the crime scene. Maybe there's something investigators overlooked. michelena2000@yahoo.com
ReplyDeleteThat's very possible.
DeleteC return to the crime scene and I don't believe in coincidences jenningsask@verizon.net
ReplyDeleteagreed.
DeleteI would start with C, then B, followed by A, and end with D. An9ther set if eyes on a crime scene never hurts in case something was overlooked or thought unrelated.
ReplyDeleteVery true.
DeleteI would start with C and then move on to A, B, and D. Sometimes the smallest details are the most important clues yet easiest to overlook.
ReplyDeletesvenable(at)westmont(dot)edu
Yes! Very true.
DeleteC followed by B & A, all close to the same time frame. While I’m at the scene, I would have somebody pull up the records of dad‘s death and then heading to talk to the family and friends.
ReplyDeleteJeeplvrdee@gmail.com
Nice!
DeleteC for sure! Always go back to the scene of the crime to get a feel for where it happened even if the forensics team didn't miss anything.
ReplyDeleteChristy41970 (at) Gmail (dot) com
That's smart!
DeleteC, while the evidence is still there, then D. Marthaelaufer@outlook.com
ReplyDeleteSmart.
DeleteC first. Then B, A and D. cji789(at)outlook(dot)com
ReplyDeleteGood thinking.
DeleteA they missed something the first time. nanaalexander@hotmail.com
ReplyDeleteVery possible.
DeleteNot entering. This is a fabulous book. It is a must read for everyone who loves mystery and suspense.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Debbie!
DeleteI would have to say to do "all of the above" to find out everything!
ReplyDeleteSmart.
DeleteC and then And B with D last.
ReplyDeleteNice!
DeleteD. Start questioning family friends and neighbors. Someone knows more than they're saying.
ReplyDeleteYes, they do.
DeleteI would say C. I love your books. lindadashhendersonatattdotnet
ReplyDeleteThank you, so much, Linda!
DeleteI think C and D. Some has to know something, even if they don't think they don't. Thank you!
ReplyDeleteAgreed.
DeleteThanks for the giveaway! I would say C. You have to start where the crime occurred and work backwards to figure out who is responsible for it. deborahdumm(AT)yahoo(DOT)com
ReplyDeleteI would start at the scene of the crime. All the other things can be done later, but physical evidence gets lost pretty quickly.
ReplyDeleteThis an interestinginvestigation
ReplyDeleteThis is an interesting investigation!! Yes, I believe coincidence in most cases! Ok, I think I would choose B first - investigate the son's final days and then A reopen the father's murder. Apparently, they are related! cwkuen(at)yahoo(dot)com
ReplyDeleteSometimes a coincidence seems a little too strange to be just chance! I love a mystery that keeps me guessing.
ReplyDeleteI would start with the crime scene. It'll tell how the crime was committed & may yield clues that the first investigators may have overlooked. A fresh pair of eyes thing.
ReplyDeleteA!
ReplyDeleteSounds great
ReplyDeleteInvestigate the son's final days
ReplyDeleteI’d choose C. Return to the crime scene. You never know what detail was overlooked the first time around, and the fact that two family members died in nearly the same location twelve years apart seems like more than a coincidence. Sometimes the smallest clue unlocks the biggest mystery! kykla99ATgmailDOTcom
ReplyDelete