Featured Post

Friday, May 1, 2026

WHAT IS YOUR CHARACTER IS WRONG


One of the hardest things to do as a suspense writer isn’t creating a clever twist or a chilling villain. It’s allowing your main character to fail.

Not just stumble. Not just hesitate. Fail


As writers, we spend so much time building competent, capable protagonists – especially in suspense. Detectives, profilers, investigators – these are people who are supposed to notice what others miss. Readers trust them. We trust them. So, when they make a mistake, when they follow the wrong lead, trust the wrong person, or come to the wrong conclusion, it can feel uncomfortable. Even risky.

But here’s the truth: those mistakes are often where the story comes alive. A character who gets everything right may be impressive, but a character who gets something wrong becomes human. And more than that, it raises the stakes.

In suspense, being wrong isn’t just embarrassing. It can be dangerous. It can cost time. It can cost trust. And sometimes, it can cost lives. That kind of weight changes everything in the story. It deepens the emotional impact of the novel. It forces your characters to question themselves. And it gives readers something powerful to connect with, because we all know what it feels like to realize we were wrong about something that mattered.

In the second book of my new series, “The Holmes and Watson Files,” my protagonist comes face-to-face with that reality. What he believed was settled isn’t settled at all. A man who spent years in prison – because of a case Detective Nate Holmes helped build – may be innocent. As Nate begins to see the truth, the pressure of his possible mistake presses in from every side. He learns that sometimes the past doesn’t stay buried – and sometimes it turns out we buried the wrong truth.

For an author, the key, of course, is balance. The mistake has to make sense. It has to come from who the character is, their past experiences, their biases, their fears. When that happens, it doesn’t weaken the story. It strengthens it. It also opens the door for one of the most satisfying elements in suspense: redemption.

When a character recognizes their mistake and chooses to face it – to correct it, learn from it, and keep going despite the cost – that’s when readers become engaged with your story. That’s when it stops being just about solving a mystery and becomes about something deeper.

So, the next time you’re tempted to let your character be the smartest person in the room, consider this:

What if they’re not?

What if they’re wrong?

You might just find that’s where your story truly begins.


Leave a comment, along with your contact information, and you could win a copy of either SHATTERED SANCTUARY or DARK DESIGN.









9 comments:

  1. So true! Even Hercule Poirot made a mistake early in his career. Perfection is unrelatable - except in our Savior. Have a great weekend. Becca12901 at yahoo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great comment. Yes, Hercule did make a mistake. (And I thought he was perfect! LOL!) Hope you have a wonderful weekend too.

      Delete
  2. I think it makes the characters more relatable and realistic if they make mistakes. We all make mistakes

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, although sometimes it's hard to admit to them. I agree about making the characters more relatable. Hard to understand perfect characters. Thanks, Nance.

      Delete
  3. Oh... I loved this. Yes! I prefer a human "hero" to a "perfect" unrelatable robot who never makes a mistake. Jesus taught us in parables because we identify with those characters. I will definitely get this new series (pre-order this one), and sharing this post. 🥰

    ReplyDelete
  4. For me, it depends on the type of mistake/failure. The one you mentioned - making a mistake in thinking - is something that doesn't bother me as a reader. In fact, it makes it more exciting usually, as you mentioned.

    More bothersome to me are when the protagonist makes a moral mistake. Such as John Smith having adultery in Stephen King's "The Dead Zone," or James Bond killing in what seems to be cold blood in several of the movies. My state of disturbment (is that a word?) is increased when that moral failure is presented as not being a moral failure.

    And then, there's where you can say the character is making obvious mistakes and by pure dumb luck stumbles onto the true killer. I read a two part series where in both books I figured out who the killer is no later than halfway through the story because there's one suspect who has motive and opportunity, but the detective dismisses that they're the killer (both times, that character learns the truth when her policeman brother shows up to arrest the villain. No, I don't care for that kind of mistake.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I almost forgot contact notification - jandbreynolds@gmail.com

      Delete